Shaft-integrated angle sensing device

ABSTRACT

A sensor arrangement includes a sensor element and a magnet module. The sensor element is configured to measure a magnetic field and is positioned within a shaft. The shaft is configured to shield the magnet module and the sensor element. The magnet module is configured to generate the magnetic field. The sensor element is at least partially positioned within the shaft.

RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application is a continuation in part of U.S. patent application U.S. Ser. No. 14/474,638 filed with the USPTO on Sep. 2, 2014, which is a continuation in part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/812,907, entitled “Magnetic Field Sensor” filed on Jul. 29, 2015, which is a continuation in part of Ser. No. 14/290,780, entitled “Magnetic-Field Sensor,” filed on May 29, 2014, which is a divisional application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/130,678, entitled “Magnetic-Field Sensor,” filed on May 30, 2008, which claims priority to German Patent Application No. 10 2007 025 000.4, which was filed on May 30, 2007, all of which applications are hereby incorporated herein by reference.

BACKGROUND

Sensors are utilized in sensing systems to detect properties, such as light, temperature, motion, and the like. One type of sensor commonly used is an angle sensor based on magnetic fields. The angle sensor measures a magnetic field direction and calculates an angle based on the field direction. Other magneto-sensitive sensors measure the magnetic flux density.

However, such magnetic based sensors are susceptible to disturbances in the magnetic field. Many systems operate in harsh environments, such as automotive systems, and have components that can disturb the magnetic field and result in faulty sensor measurements.

What are needed are techniques to mitigate or prevent disturbances to enhance magnetic sensor operation, accuracy and robustness against positioning tolerances.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a diagram of an integrated sensor system that operates using magnetic fields.

FIG. 2 is a cross sectional diagram of a shaft-integrated sensor system having a hollow shaft and a ring shaped magnet module.

FIG. 3 is a cross sectional diagram of a shaft-integrated sensor system having a hollow shaft and a pill shaped magnet.

FIG. 4 is a cross sectional diagram of an integrated sensor system having a solid shaft and a ring shaped magnet module.

FIG. 5 is a cross sectional diagram of an integrated sensor system having a solid shaft and a pill shaped magnet.

FIG. 6 is a diagram depicting a sensor module system.

FIG. 7 is a cross-sectional diagram illustrating a ring shaped magnet that can be utilized in a magnet module, such as the magnet modules described above.

FIG. 8 is a cross-sectional view illustrating a pill or cylindrically shaped magnet that can be utilized in a magnet module, such as the magnet modules described above.

FIG. 9 is a flow diagram illustrating a method of operating a sensor device.

FIG. 10 is a cross-sectional view of a portion of a shaft usable in combination with sensor systems as described herein.

FIG. 11A illustrates a scenario used in numerical simulations.

FIG. 11B illustrates some results of the simulations calculated based on the scenario illustrated in FIG. 11A.

FIG. 12 illustrates an arrangement of a sensor inserted into a shaft in a cross-sectional view.

FIG. 12A illustrates a further embodiment of a sensor integrated into a bore of a shaft.

FIG. 12B illustrates another embodiment of a sensor integrated into a thin-walled end portion of a shaft with a sleeve.

FIG. 12C illustrates saturation of a magnetiseable thin-walled end portion of a shaft as in the embodiments of FIGS. 10, 12A, and 12B.

FIG. 12D illustrates another embodiment of a sensor integrated into a thin-walled end portion of a shaft with yet another sleeve.

FIG. 12E illustrates another embodiment of a sensor integrated into a thin-walled end portion of a shaft with an alternative sleeve.

FIG. 13 illustrates a setup for a leaded sensor package.

FIGS. 14A-14D illustrate symmetry considerations for magnet and sensor arrangements according to the present disclosure.

FIGS. 15A-15I illustrate various symmetries for arranging magnet(s) within a thin-walled bore at an end portion of a shaft.

FIG. 16 illustrates a split magnet within a bore

FIG. 17 illustrates a magnet comprising grooves inserted into a bore of a shaft.

FIG. 18 illustrates a key in order to orient a magnet within a bore of a shaft.

FIG. 19A illustrates a further magnet embodiment within a bore of a shaft.

FIG. 19B illustrates yet another magnet arrangement within a tapered bore of a shaft.

FIG. 20 illustrates another magnet arrangement within a bore of a shaft.

FIGS. 21A, 21B, and 21C illustrate sealing of an opening of a bore comprising a magnet arrangement and a sensing element.

FIG. 22A, 22B illustrate Halbach-type magnet arrangements.

FIG. 22C illustrates yet another unitary inhomogeneous magnet arrangement.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The present invention will now be described with reference to the attached drawing figures, wherein like reference numerals are used to refer to like elements throughout, and wherein the illustrated structures and devices are not necessarily drawn to scale.

Devices, systems and methods are disclosed that facilitate angle sensors and mitigate disturbances in magnetic fields. Harsh environments, such as automotive systems, have a variety of components and conditions that impact electronics, sensors, and magnetic fields. These disturbances can result in faulty measurements, sensor failures, and require meeting position tolerances in order to achieve a certain precision level in operation of the sensor. Angle sensors are typically of interest to identify an angular position of an object rotating about an axis. In some applications it may be of interest to identify an angular position unambiguously over 180 degrees, only; i.e. half a rotation. In other applications it may however be of interest to identify an angular position unambiguously over 360 degrees, which corresponds to a full rotation the object rotation about the axis.

FIG. 1 is a diagram of an integrated sensor system 100 that operates using magnetic fields. The system 100 is provided in a simplified form in order to facilitate understanding. The system 100 can be utilized in harsh environments, automotive systems, vehicle systems, and the like. The system 100 can be fabricated into one or more devices or arrangements.

Hybrid systems, such as automotive systems, have mechanical components and electrical components. The mechanical components include engines, motors, wheels, fluids, brake systems, actuators and the like. The electrical components include sensors, processing units, control units and the like. The mechanical components can create disturbances for the electrical components. These disturbances include power surges, power loss, power traces, high power traces, vibration, debris, metal flakes/pieces, fluid contamination, transmission fluid contamination (very aggressive), break cleaner, coolant, material, dirt, and the like. The more motors, actuators, and other components, the more current and fluctuations are present.

Other approaches are susceptible to disturbances and fail to provide mechanisms against these disturbances.

Typically an angle sensor will track a rotational movement of an axis or a shaft. One approach is to add a sensor to an end of a shaft and encapsulate the sensor. However, encapsulation adds cost and additional processing and requires additional space. Additionally, such approaches also include placing a sensor element at an end of a shaft. This increases the overall length of the shaft or component attached thereto, which requires extra vehicle/engine space. Additional mounts, connectors, and the like are required to mount the sensor to the end of the shaft. These can further increase the length/space consumed and require even more vehicle/engine space.

The system 100 includes an optional sensor module 102, a sensor element 104, and a magnet module 106. The sensor module 102 may be in the form of a package or any other aid for placing the sensor 104 as will be explained further down. The system 100 may integrate the sensor module 102 with a shield in the form of a case, shaft or other component to provide self-shielding. Additionally, by being integrated, the system 100 consumes less space than other approaches. Further, the system 100 utilizes the self-shielding to permit components having lower capabilities while providing suitable or selected accuracy.

The sensor module 102 may be in some implementations an integrated component in that it is integrated in a case or other component. The sensor module 102 includes the integrated sensor element 104. The module 102 can also include power regulation components, signal generation components, memory components and the like. Although not shown, other components including mounts, fasteners, connections, housing, and the like can be included. In one example, the sensor module 102 is formed on a die having a lead frame. The sensor module 102 is enclosed in a housing using over molded plastic. Connectors to the lead frame are provided and provide external connections to the sensor module 102, as shall be explained in more detail below. The sensor module can be coupled to or incorporated into components, such as a case, lever, arm, axle leg, and the like.

The sensor element 104 measures a direction of a magnetic field or a direction of a flux of a magnetic field. The element 104 or another component then calculates a characteristic, such as angle or shaft position, based on the measurement of field direction. The sensor element 104 is configured to receive supply power, provide measurements, and/or receive control or calibration information. In one example, a single interface is used for supply power and transferring measurements. In another example, multiple wires or ports are used for power and/or communication.

The sensor element 104 is an absolute or 360 degree type sensor, meaning that it can measure flux at any angle over a full rotation uniquely. It is of a suitable type, such as magneto-resistive or magneto-sensitive types of elements.

The magnet module 106 is affixed or attached to or integrated with a component to be measured and is configured to generate a magnetic field proximate the sensor element 104. The magnet module 106 may be diametrically magnetized, in one example. The magnet module 106 can include magnets of a variety of sizes and shapes. Some example shapes include pill or solid magnets, ring magnets, and the like. The sizes are selected to provide a suitable magnetic field. Typically, the sizes include a thickness and a diameter.

Disturbances, such as those shown above, can disturb a magnetic field which is being measured by the sensor element 104. However, the sensor module 102 is integrated with a component to shield the module 102 and the element 104, without requiring extensive encapsulation or other mechanisms to mitigate the disturbances. The component providing the shielding for the sensor element 104 and the magnet module 106 includes, for example, a rotatable object, such as a shaft, rod, and the like, comprised of a suitable material. In one example the suitable material includes a relatively soft magnetic material having a permeability of greater than 1.

FIG. 2 is a cross sectional diagram of an integrated sensor system 200 having a hollow shaft and a ring shaped magnet module. The system 200 is provided in a simplified form in order to facilitate understanding. The system 200 can be utilized in harsh environments, automotive systems, vehicle systems, and the like. The system 200 can be fabricated into one or more devices. Additional details for some of the component can be referenced from the above description of similarly numbered components.

The system 200 includes a case 208, a sensor module 102, a sensor element 104, a magnet module 206, and a shaft 210. The system 200 integrates the sensor module 102 with the shaft 210, which shields the sensor module 102 and the magnet module 206 from disturbances and enforces magnetic fields generated by the magnet module 206.

The sensor module 102 includes the sensor element 104 formed within a housing. The housing is typically an over molded plastic but not limited thereto. The sensor element 104 may be configured with a lead frame. Then module 102 includes connections from the lead frame of the sensor element 104 to ports or external connections, as will be explained in more detail with regards to FIG. 13.

The case 208 can be part of a transmission box, compartment, powertrain combustion engine, and the like. The case 208 is configured to receive and support the shaft 210. The case 208 in one embodiment includes a hollowed out recess into which the shaft 210 is inserted. Bearings 212 or another component/device are configured to facilitate rotation of the shaft 210 without excess friction. The case 208 may also include a module opening wherein a sensor module 102 is inserted or positioned. It is to be understood that the sensor module, when placed in the module opening, will facilitate an intended positioning of the actual sensor element 104 relative to the rotatable shaft 210 and a magnet 206 making rotations of the shaft 210 “visible” to the sensor element 104. It is noted that the sensor module 102 is removable from the case 208. In another example, the sensor module is irremovably attached to the case 208. In one example, the case 208 provides a hermitic seal that protects the sensor module 102 from debris and contaminants. Additionally, the case 208 can be configured to provide magnetic and/or electrical shielding. Aspects of shielding the sensor element 104 and/or the magnet 206 from any external magnetic fields will be discussed in more detail below with regards to FIGS. 10-18.

The shaft 210 is separate from the case 208. A first end of the shaft is attached to a motor or other rotatable object and a second end is proximate the case 208. The second end of the shaft 210 can be coupled to bearings to facilitate rotation. The shaft 210 can be part of an automotive system, such as a power train, transmission system, and the like. The shaft 210 is generally a long cylindrical rod comprised of a suitable material, such as a metal, soft magnetic material, and the like. Some examples of a suitable metal include steel and aluminum. An example of a soft magnetic material includes a material having a magnetic permeability of greater than 1. The shaft 210 rotates at a range of rotations per minute (RPM) and in a rotational direction, clockwise or counter clockwise. The RPM can include low RPM ranges, such as 0 to 200 RPM and high RPM ranges, such as those exceeding 4,000 RPM.

The shaft 210 is shown having an axis of rotation shown as z. The shaft 210 rotates about the axis of rotation with a rotational direction, which can be clockwise or counter clockwise.

The shaft 210 can be hollowed out, solid, or otherwise configured. In FIG. 2, the shaft 210 is hollowed and has a selected wall thickness. Alternatively the shaft 210 may be solid and comprise a thinned-wall end portion as shown in FIG. 2. At least a portion of the sensor module 102 and the sensor element 104 extends partially into the open portion of the shaft 210 at the second end. Additionally, the magnet module 206 is located at least partially within the open portion of the shaft as well. By being hollowed, the shaft can be of a lower cost and weight as compared with solid shafts.

The magnet module 206 generates a magnetic field having flux and configured for measurement. In this example, the magnet module 206 includes a ring shaped magnet positioned along an inner surface of the shaft 210, namely an inner circumferential surface in FIG. 2. The ring shaped magnet partially surrounds the sensor module 102 and surrounds the sensor element 104 with regards to the rotational axis z.

The sensor module 102 is integrated into the case 208, in this example. The sensor module 102 can include an O-ring or similar material to seal between the sensor module 102 and the case 208 (not shown in FIG. 2). The sensor element 104 is positioned proximate at a second end of the module 102. The sensor element 104 typically measures the magnetic field generated by the magnet module 206, more precisely a direction of the magnetic field when used as an angle sensor. Upon rotation of the shaft 210 the magnetic field generated by the magnet will appear to the sensor element 104 as a rotating magnetic field that may be used to monitor a rotational position of the shaft.

The measurements obtained by the sensor element 104 are used to calculate angular measurements including radial position of the shaft, angular position of the shaft, rotations per minute (RPM), direction of rotation and the like.

A control unit, such as an electronic control unit (ECU) can receive the measurements and or angular information from the sensor module 102.

FIG. 3 is a cross sectional diagram of an shaft-integrated sensor system 300 having a hollow shaft or at least a thin walled end portion of the shaft and a pill shaped magnet. The system 300 is provided in a simplified form in order to facilitate understanding. The system 300 can be utilized in harsh environments, automotive systems, vehicle systems, and the like. The system 300 can be fabricated into one or more devices. The system 300 is similar to the system 200, described above, but utilizes a pill or round shaped magnet instead of a ring shaped magnet. Additional details for some of the component can be referenced from the above description of similarly numbered components.

The system 300 includes a case 208, a sensor module 102, a sensor element 104, a magnet module 306, and a shaft 210. The system 300 integrates the sensor module 102 into the shaft 210, which electrically, mechanically, and/or magnetically shields the sensor module 102 from disturbances.

The sensor module 102 includes the sensor element 104 formed within a housing. The housing is an over molded plastic. The sensor element 104 is typically configured with a lead frame. The module 102 includes connections from the lead frame of the sensor element 104 to ports or external connections.

The case 208 can be part of a power train, transmission system, and the like. The case 208 is configured to receive and support the shaft 210. The case 208 includes a hollowed out recess, referred to as a case recess, into which the shaft 210 is inserted. Bearings 212 or another component/device are configured to facilitate rotation of the shaft 210 without excess friction.

The shaft 210 is separate from the case 208. A first end of the shaft is attached to a motor or other rotatable object and a second end is proximate the case 208. The shaft 210 is generally a long cylindrical rod comprised of a suitable material, such as described above. The shaft 210 rotates at a range of rotations per minute (RPM) and in a rotational direction, clockwise or counter clockwise. The RPM can include low RPM ranges, such as 0 to 200 RPM and high RPM ranges, such as those exceeding 4,000 RPM.

The shaft 210 can be hollowed out, solid, or otherwise configured. In FIG. 3, the shaft 210 is again hollowed and has a selected wall thickness. A portion of the sensor module 102 extends partially into the open portion of the shaft 210 at the second end. The magnet module 306 is located within the open portion of the shaft.

The magnet module 306 generates a magnetic field having flux and configured for measurement. The shaft 210 enforces the generated magnetic field. In this example, the magnet module 306 includes a pill or round shaped magnet positioned across the opening in the shaft 210. The pill shaped magnet is positioned along the same axis z as the sensor module 102 and the sensor element 104. Furthermore, the pill shaped magnet has a diameter and thickness selected to provide a suitable magnetic field. The diameter can be less than a diameter of the inner surface of the shaft 210.

The sensor module 102 is integrated into the case 208, as described above. The sensor module 102 can include an O-ring or similar material to seal between the sensor module 102 and the case 208. The sensor element is positioned proximate to a second end of the module 102. The sensor element 104 measures the magnetic field, more precisely an orientation of the magnetic field generated by the magnet module 306.

The measurements obtained by the sensor element 104 are used to calculate azimuthal or angular position of the shaft, rotations per minute (RPM), direction of rotation, and the like.

A control unit, such as an electronic control unit (ECU) can receive the measurements and/or angular information from the sensor module 102.

FIG. 4 is a cross sectional diagram of a sensor system 400 having a solid shaft 410 and a ring shaped magnet module 206. The system 400 is provided in a simplified form in order to facilitate understanding. The system 400 can be utilized in harsh environments, automotive systems, vehicle systems, and the like. Additionally, the system 400 can be fabricated into one or more devices. Additional details for some of the component can be referenced from the above description of similarly numbered components.

The system 400 includes a case 208, a sensor module 102, a sensor element 104, a magnet module 206, and a shaft 410. The system 200 integrates the sensor module 102 into the shaft 410, which electrically, mechanically, and or magnetically shields the sensor module 102 from disturbances.

The sensor module 102 again includes the sensor element 104 optionally formed within a housing. The housing, in one example, is an over molded plastic. The sensor element 104 may be configured with a lead frame. The module 102 may include connections from the lead frame of the sensor element 104 to ports or external connections.

The case 208 can be part of a power train, transmission system, and the like. The case 208 is configured to receive and support the shaft 410. The case 208 includes a hollowed out recess into which the shaft 410 is inserted. Optional Bearings 212 or another component/device is configured to facilitate rotation of the shaft 410 without excess friction.

The shaft 410 is separate from the case 208. A first end of the shaft is attached to a motor or other rotatable object and a second end is proximate the case 208. The shaft 410 is generally a long cylindrical rod comprised of a suitable material, such as a metal. Some examples of a suitable metal are shown above. The shaft 410 rotates at a range of rotations per minute (RPM) and in a rotational direction, clockwise or counter clockwise. The RPM can include low RPM ranges, such as 0 to 200 RPM and high RPM ranges, such as those exceeding 4,000 RPM.

The shaft 410, in this example, is solid and has a selected diameter. The second end of the shaft 410 includes a shaft cavity 414. The cavity 414 is formed within the second end using a suitable mechanism, such as drilling. The cavity 414 has a diameter and a depth. At least a portion of the sensor module 102 extends into the shaft cavity 414. Additionally, the magnet module 206 is located within the shaft cavity. The shaft 410, by being solid, can have superior strength as compared with hollowed shafts, as discussed with regards to FIGS. 2 and 3.

The magnet module 206 generates a magnetic field having flux and configured for measurement. In this example, the magnet module 206 includes a ring shaped magnet positioned about an inner surface of the shaft cavity 414. The ring shaped magnet partially surrounds the sensor module 102 and surrounds the sensor element 104 in z direction. The ring shaped magnet 206 typically provides a better field for measuring with regards to axial displacement than a pill shaped magnet.

The sensor module 102 is integrated into the case 208, in this example. The sensor module 102 can include an O-ring or similar material to seal between the sensor module 102 and the case 208. The sensor element is positioned proximate at a second end of the module 102. The sensor element 104 measures the magnetic field generated by the magnet module 206.

The measurements obtained by the sensor element 104 are used to calculate radial position of the shaft, rotations per minute (RPM), direction of rotation and the like. A control unit (not shown), such as an electronic control unit (ECU) can receive the measurements and or angular information from the sensor module 102.

FIG. 5 is a cross sectional diagram of an shaft integrated sensor system 500 having a solid shaft and a pill shaped magnet. The system 500 is provided in a simplified form in order to facilitate understanding. The system 500 can be utilized in harsh environments, automotive systems, vehicle systems, and the like. Additionally, the system 500 can be fabricated into one or more devices. Additional details for some of the component can be referenced from the above description of similarly numbered components.

The system 500 includes a case 208, a sensor module 102, a sensor element 104, a magnet module 306, and a shaft 410. The system 200 integrates the sensor module 102 and the magnet module 306 into the shaft 410, which electrically, mechanically, and or magnetically shields the sensor module 102 from disturbances.

The sensor module 102 includes the sensor element 104 formed within a housing. The housing is an over molded plastic. The sensor element 104 may be configured with a lead frame. The module 102 includes connections from the lead frame of the sensor element 104 to ports or external connections.

The case 208 can be part of a powertrain, transmission system and the like. The case 208 is configured to receive and support the shaft 410. The case 208 includes a hollowed out recess into which the shaft 410 is inserted. Bearings 212 or another component/device are configured to facilitate rotation of the shaft 410 without excess friction.

The shaft 410 is separate from the case 208. A first end of the shaft is attached to a motor or other rotatable object and a second end is proximate the case 208. The shaft 410 is generally a long cylindrical rod comprised of a suitable material, such as shown above. The shaft 410 rotates at a range of rotations per minute (RPM) and in a rotational direction, clockwise or counter clockwise. The RPM can include low RPM ranges and high RPM ranges and variations thereof.

The shaft 410 is solid and has a selected diameter. The second end of the shaft 410 includes a shaft cavity 414. The cavity 414 is formed within the second end using a suitable mechanism. The cavity 414 has a diameter and a depth. A portion of the sensor module 102 extends partially into the shaft cavity 414. Additionally, the magnet module 306 is located within the shaft cavity.

The magnet module 306 generates a magnetic field having flux and configured for measurement. In this example, the magnet module 306 includes a pill shaped magnet positioned in the shaft cavity 414. The pill shaped magnet is positioned on an axis with the sensor 104, namely the z axis in FIG. 5. Further, the pill shaped magnet has a diameter and thickness, as described above in regards to FIG. 3.

The sensor module 102 is integrated into the case 208 and the shaft 410, in this example. The sensor module 102 can include an O-ring or similar material to seal between the sensor module 102 and the case 208. The sensor element is positioned proximate at a second end of the module 102. The sensor element 104 measures the magnetic field or a direction of the magnetic field generated by the magnet module 206. The magnetic field from the magnet 206 is “visible” to the sensor as a rotating magnetic field indicative of an angular position of the rotating shaft 410.

The measurements obtained by the sensor element 104 are used to calculate radial position of the shaft, rotations per minute (RPM), direction of rotation and the like, as was already explained above. A control unit (not shown), such as an electronic control unit (ECU) can receive the measurements and/or angular information from the sensor module 102. The measurements or information include analog or digital raw data, calculated angle information, and the like.

FIG. 6 is a diagram depicting a sensor module system 600. The system 600 can be used with the above systems and devices and is provided to facilitate understanding.

The system 600 includes a sensor module 102, an interface 616, and a controller or control unit 614. The sensor module 102 includes a sensor element 104. The sensor element 104 is a magneto sensitive technology, such as magneto resistive, Hall effect, and the like. The sensor element 104 is configured to measure a magnetic field, magnetic flux density, magnetic field direction, and the like proximate the element 104. The sensor element 104 is formed on a die and has a lead frame for power and providing measurements.

The sensor module 102 includes a housing 618 formed of a suitable material, such as over molded plastic. The housing 618 generally seals the sensor element 104 from debris and other disturbances.

The interface 616 is connected to the sensor element 104. The interface 616 can include one or more wires/connections to the sensor element 104 and external to the housing 618. The interface 616 is configured to transfer measurement results from the sensor element 104 to the controller 614, and supply power to the sensor element 104.

The controller 614 is connected to the interface 616 and is configured to control the sensor element 104 and receive magnetic field/flux measurement results from the sensor element 104. The controller 614 determines angular information about a component, such as angle position, angular position, rotational speed, acceleration, and the like. The component is generally a rotatable component, such as a motor shaft, wheel, powertrain shaft, transmission shaft, and the like. In particular, the controller 614 is configured to determine angular position, angular direction, RPM, and the like.

FIG. 7 is a cross sectional view of a ring shaped magnet 700 that can be utilized in a magnet module, such as the magnet modules described above. The ring shaped magnet 700 can be utilized in the above systems to generate a magnetic field for measuring angular information, including position and RPM.

The magnet 700 is positioned within an end of a shaft of a motor, wheel, and the like. The magnet generates a suitable field determined by its composition and dimensions.

The dimensions include an outer diameter 720, a width thickness 722, and an inner diameter 724. The difference between the inner diameter 724 and the outer diameter defines a ring thickness. Generally, the larger the width thickness and the ring thickness, the larger the generated magnetic field and the more tolerant the sensor element can be against displacements of the sensor relative to the magnet, also referred to as positioning tolerances.

FIG. 8 is cross sectional view of a pill or round shaped magnet 800 that can be utilized in a magnet module, such as the magnet modules described above. The pill shaped magnet 800 can be utilized in the above systems to generate a magnetic field for measuring angular information, including position and RPM.

The magnet 800 may be positioned within an end of a shaft of a motor, wheel, and the like. The magnet 800 generates a suitable magnetic field distribution or flux, determined by its composition and dimensions.

The dimensions include a diameter 820 and a thickness 822. Generally, the larger the diameter 820 and the larger the thickness 822, the larger the generated magnetic field and the more tolerant the sensor element can be against positional tolerances, as shall be explained in more detail below.

FIG. 9 is a flow diagram illustrating a method 900 of operating a sensor device. The method 900 inserts or integrates a sensor module into a shaft in order to provide shielding against disturbances and optionally enforces generation of a magnetic field. The method 900 can be used in conjunction with the above systems, devices and variations thereof.

The method 900 begins at block 902, wherein a sensor module is configured or positioned into a shaft and/or a case. The shaft provides shielding to the sensor module so that disturbances, such as those described above, are mitigated or avoided. The case can be a housing or wall of a compartment, such as an automotive transmission component, and the like. The sensor module may be over molded and is typically removable from the case. The sensor module includes a sensor element (magneto resistive) configured to measure magnetic fields in one, two or three axis (1D, 2D, 3D), or a direction of magnetic fields.

A shaft is configured to have a shaft recess and a magnet module is positioned within the shaft recess at block 904. The shaft recess can be formed in a solid or hollowed shaft by drilling or another suitable mechanism. The magnet module includes a magnet, such as a ring shaped magnet or a pill shaped magnet.

A magnetic field is generated by the magnet module at block 906. The magnetic field rotates with the shaft as the shaft is rotated. The magnet module is substantially shielded from disturbances by the shaft and, as a result, the magnetic field is generated without the disturbances.

The magnetic field is measured by the sensor module at block 908. The sensor module is shielded by the shaft and, as a result, is substantially shielded from disturbances. As a result, magnetic field measurements using some shielding are generally more accurate than non-shielded approaches.

Angular information is determined by a control unit based on the magnetic field measurements at block 910. The angular information includes, for example, rotational speed of the shaft, angular position of the shaft, and the like. It will be appreciated that the angular information may alternatively be derived by the sensor element and the derived angular information is being forwarded to the ECU.

Contemplating a setup as in FIG. 10, it shall be discussed in the following how deep the sensor element (as discussed for example with regards to FIGS. 1-6) should preferably be inside the axis or tube 101). FIG. 10 shows cross-sectional view of a shaft 101 with a bore at its left end. A bore diameter is Di. The shaft 101 may be made of a soft magnetic material. This means that the relative permeability μ_(r) is greater than 100, typically between 1000 and 10000, and the coercivity is small, typically less than 1 kA/m. The magnet (see for example magnet 206 in FIGS. 2, and 4, magnet 306 in FIGS. 3 and 5, magnet ring 700 in FIG. 7, or magnetic pill 800 of FIG. 8) is not shown here because it is irrelevant for the following rule which will be given.

The sensor element 104 (not shown in FIG. 10) has a sensitive spot, which is denoted by a cross x on the rotation axis z. Irrespective of a given magnet, the sensitive spot of the magnetic field sensing element 104 (for example sensor element 104 of FIGS. 1-6, respectively) should preferable be at a distance da inside the bore, with da>0.4*Di. Under this condition, the permeable thin walled shaft end will effectively shield external magnetic fields from the sensor element 104. If the sensor element 104 is inserted more than da=0.4*Di, the shielding generally improves, yet only moderately for large da. If the sensor element 104 is inserted less than da=0.4*Di a significant portion of any external magnetic field is still present at the sensor location and may corrupt (angle) sensor function of the sensor element 104.

FIG. 11A shows a configuration used for numerical simulations in order to arrive at the above estimate of insertion da of the sensor element 104 to be less than 0.4*Di into the bore of a thin-walled end portion of rotatable shaft 101. Assumed parameters in the simulation were: an inner diameter Di=22 mm of the shaft, an outer diameter of the shaft of 26 mm, a relative permeability μ_(r) of the axis was varied from 100 to 7400. The tube 101 extends along z-direction from z=−50 mm to +50 mm. Only ⅛-th of the geometry is modeled in FIG. 11A due to symmetry considerations. In these simulations a magnetic disturbance field in the B_(x) direction was applied and the sensor element 104 is assumed to be sensitive to the B_(x) component.

FIG. 11B illustrates results of a simulation based on the parameters and setup as outlined in connection with FIG. 11A. In FIG. 11B a magnitude of the ratio of B_(x) component sampled at the sensor location over the applied B_(x) component at large distance outside the tube is plotted.

As abscissa for the plot of FIG. 11B a ratio of z-position over diameter (at z=0.05 m the tube ends) is plotted which is equal to (−1)*da/Di for the above parameters used in the simulation. The parameter that was varied in the simulation of FIG. 11B was the relative permeability p_(r).

If a test point, namely the potential sensor position along the z-axis is half a diameter inside the tube 101, the shielding is quite good. Deep inside the tube 102 shielding is

${1\text{/}\left( {1 + {\mu_{r}*\frac{d}{Di}}} \right)},$

according to Kaden “Wirbelströme and Schirmung in der Nachrichtentechnik”, p. 82, wherein d denotes a wall thickness. According to FIG. 10 2*d is equal to outer diameter D−inner diameter Di). From this formula one may deduce the following rule of thumb for the angle error, when the magnetic field sensing element is deep inside the bore: An angle error [°]=ca. (57/μr)*(Di/d)*(B_(d)/B_(m)), with the disturbance magnetic field B_(d) and the magnetic field of the magnet B_(m). Usually, the disturbance fields are up to 1.5 mT, the field of the magnet is 40 mT, and the angle error should be less than 0.2°. Therefore one arrives at a design rule of: pr*d/Di>10. The relative permeability μ_(r) of the shield times its thickness d divided by the inner diameter should be larger than 10.

EXAMPLE

The tube 101 has 22 mm inner diameter and 2 mm wall thickness, the field of the magnet is 40 mT, and the disturbance is 1.5 mT. If the sensor is 11 mm inside the tube with μ_(r=)800 the shielding is 3%, so the disturbance inside the tube is 0.03*1.5 mT=0.045 mT. his gives an angle error of 0.045/40*180/pi=0.065° and it holds μ_(r*d/Di=)800*2/22=73 >0. If one reduced μ_(r) by a factor of 7.3, this would give a limit μr*d/Di=10 and lead to 0.065°*7.3=0.47° angle error. For better shielding larger μ_(r) and/or thicker wall of the tube 101 and/or smaller diameter Di of the bore are of advantage, respectively.

From the numerical simulation above, a person of ordinary skill will understand that for small μ_(r) the shielding is less than for large μ_(r)—which is trivial. Yet a person of ordinary skill will further recognize that for large μ_(r) it is all the more of interest to insert the sensor element 104 deep enough into the bore of the shaft 101: This is to say, if the sensor element 104 was only 0.4*Di (which corresponds to the abscissa value (z−0.05)/0.022=−0.4) inserted into the bore, the shielding is pretty much the same for μr=7400 and μr=3200, yet, if the sensor element 104 was inserted by Di (which corresponds to the abscissa value (z−0.05)/0.022=−1) the μ_(r)=7400 curve shields external fields more than 2.5 times better than for μ_(r)=3200.

A further aspect to be considered is an effect of eddy currents and/or hysteresis, for a set-up, wherein the sensor element 104 and/or the magnet are arranged within a bore along the axis of rotation.

If the magnetic sensing element 104 is positioned along the rotation axis (which is the z-axis in FIG. 10), and the permanent magnet is attached to the rotatable shaft, there are two possibilities for shielding the magnetic sensing element 104 from external magnetic disturbances:

(i) the shield can be at rest with respect to the magnet, or (ii) magnet and shield can rotate against each other.

In case (i) the shield can be attached to the magnet or to the shaft 101, so that magnet and shield rotate synchronously around the (magnetic field) sensing element 104. In case (ii) the shield can be attached to the sensor element 104 or to a stator, such as a mounting point for the shaft, not rotating with the shaft.

It is preferred that the shield does not move relative to the magnet. Such a setup will prevent the strong field of the magnet (206 in FIGS. 2, 4, 306 in FIGS. 3, 5, 700 in FIGS. 7 and 800 in FIG. 8) to generate eddy currents inside the shield. These eddy currents should be avoided, because they produce a secondary magnetic field which leads to an angle error in the angle measurement of the sensor 104. The eddy currents lead to a magnetic field that lags behind the rotating magnetic field during rotation of the shaft, which is all the more critical the faster the rotation of the shaft 101 is.

Moreover, there is a small force between eddy currents and magnet, which could disturb, for example in the form of rotational energy being dissipated into heat.

Further, an accurate relative positioning between shield and magnet is of interest when using a shield. Assume magnet and shield are not coaxial this may distort the magnetic field sensed by the sensing element 104 and lead to angle errors. Generally, it is simpler to define an exact position between shield and magnet, if they do not move against each other. Conversely, their relative positioning is less accurate, if they rotate against each other, for instance due to clearances in the bearings.

Finally, a magnetic hysteresis of the shield may lead to additional angle errors for the measured angle. If the direction of rotation changes frequently: the shield may add small magnetic distortions to the magnetic field caused by the magnet. The magnetic distortions due to hysteresis of the magnetic shield are typically different for clockwise and counterclockwise rotation, because the hysteresis of the shield makes the total field lagging behind the field of the magnet.

In certain cases it might still be preferable to use a magnetic shield that is at rest with the sensor 104 and therefore the magnet rotates against the shield: Such a setup is of interest, if the inertia moment of the shaft 101 needs to be kept small so that one does not want to mount the shield on the shaft 101.

Further up in this disclosure the sensing element 104 was described as an integrated circuit. As an alternative the sensing element 104 may be implemented as a discrete element. Both options have their own merits, as shall be explained in more detail in the following.

An angle sensor circuit implementing the sensing element 104 typically needs at least one magnetic field sensing element to detect the rotational position of the magnet based on the (rotating) magnetic field at the sensor position. To this end one can use magneto-resistors like AMRs (anisotropic magneto-resistors), GMRs (giant magneto-resistors), TMRs (tunneling magneto-resistors), CMRs (colossal magneto-resistors), Hall plates, Vertical Hall effect devices, MAGFETs or magneto-impedance sensor element.

In many cases the sensor circuit needs even two or more such sensor elements in order to implement the sensing element 104, which are aligned in different directions: The different directions are: in case of magneto-resistors or Hall effect devices their reference directions (that is the current flow direction in case of AMRs, Hall effect devices, and MAGFETs, while the reference direction is a direction of pinned magnetization in case of GMR, TMR, CMR). The different directions need to be notably different, which means at least by 15° different.

In an ideal setup the different directions are different by 90°; except for AMRs, where they are 45° different. These more than one magnetic field sensing elements should be small compared to the magnet and close together (close compared to a characteristic dimension of the magnet): If the magnet has a dimension of 10 mm, all magnetic field sensing elements used to compute the angle when implementing the sensing element 104 should be within a region of <0.5 mm (i.e. 1/20-th of the magnet). As a preferred upper limit one can say: they should be not more than 1/10-th of the size of the magnet apart. Size of the magnet shall be construed in the following: The magnet arrangement is typically characterized by three spatial dimensions. Depending on circumstances the three spatial dimensions may be identical, in which case this dimension may be considered a size of the magnet. If however the three spatial dimensions of the magnet are not identical, for the remainder of this disclosure any of the three spatial dimensions may be considered representing a size of the magnet. For implementing the sensing element 104 it is irrelevant, if only the magnetic field sensing elements are placed inside the bore 101, or if magnetic field sensing elements plus signal conditioning circuitry are placed inside the bore 101 (best seen in FIG. 10). In the first case the sensing element 104 may be implemented using discrete transducers, in the latter case the sensing element 104 may be implemented using integrated sensors.

Integrated sensors shall be construed as comprising an integrated circuit. The integrated circuit is an electronic circuit supplying power to the sensor elements and optionally conditioning their output signals e.g. by pre-amplifying and A/D-conversion and calibration versus temperature drift etc. Depending on circumstances it may be of interest to implement the integrated sensor on a single chip or as a multiple chip solution in a common package. TMRs are ideally suited as discrete magnetic field sensing devices, because they generate large signals, which can be transmitted over a distance of several centimeters or several tens of centimeters to a signal conditioning circuit. It is also possible to mount several chips into a single electronic package and insert this into the bore of the shaft 101.

Finally it should be mentioned that the integrated sensor, more precisely a sensor chip does not need to be aligned along the z-axis or along any pre-defined orientation inside the magnet or inside the shaft 101, if the integrated sensor implementing the sensing element 104 is a 3D-magnetic field sensor. 3D-magnetic field sensor shall be construed as a sensor that measures substantially all components of the magnetic field vector. Such a 3D-magnetic field sensor can consist of a Hall plate to detect e.g. the x-component of the magnetic field vector, a Vertical Hall effect device to detect e.g. the y-component of the magnetic field vector, plus a Vertical Hall effect device to detect e.g. the z-component of the magnetic field vector. A person of ordinary skill will readily appreciate other possible implementations of a 3D sensor which shall not be explained here for the sake of brevity.

A person of ordinary skill in the art will further appreciate that a bearing used when positioning the sensing element 104 inside the shaft 210 may have an effect on a performance of the angle sensor 104, as will be briefly discussed in the following.

FIG. 12 illustrates a cross-sectional view of the end portion of the shaft 210 comprising a magnet 206. The bearing 212 is used to mount a case 208 which in turn helps to mount the sensor element(s) 104. Since the magnetic field sensing element(s) 104 and the magnet 206 are placed inside the bore at the end portion of the shaft 210, there is a potential risk that the sensing element(s) 104 and/or the magnet 206 interfere with the bearing 212 (e.g. ball bearing, but not limited thereto) of the shaft 210, which is usually near the end portion 210 of the shaft, too.

On one hand side the bore reduces the strength of the shaft 210. If a wall thickness ((D−Di)/2 in FIG. 10) is too low, it may happen that under heavy load the end portion of the shaft 210 deforms which can lead to the magnet 206 breaking or loosening and no longer being rigidly attached to the shaft 210. If the bearing 212 fails, it may heat up and this temperature rise may cause the magnet 206 to malfunction or to disintegrate or loosen from the end portion of the shaft 210. The bearing 212 usually employs some kind of grease to reduce friction and this grease my reach the sensor package 102 and/or the magnet 206, where it may lead to unwanted chemical interaction (e.g. reduce the strength of glue which attaches the magnet 206 to the shaft 210).

One simple remedy against these problems is to move the sensor element 104 and the magnet deeper inside the bore, which is anyhow recommended in order to improve electro-magnetic shielding.

FIG. 12A illustrates a first solution to some of the issues related to the bearing as discussed before. FIG. 12A shows a cross-sectional view of an end portion of the shaft 101 parallel to an axis of rotation which is indicated as z-axis.

In FIG. 12A a bearing 212 is pulled over a shaft 101 further than in FIG. 12, this is to say the bearing is positioned further away from the bore. In the setup of FIG. 12A there are two magnets 206 producing a magnetic field at a position of the sensing element 104. Without limitation the magnets 206 may be implemented as a unitary member or comprising more than two members. The position of the sensing element 104 at a distance da away from an opening of the bore is again indicated by a cross x, as was discussed before in connection with FIG. 10.

For the arrangement of FIG. 12A force and mechanical stress experienced by the magnet 206 and caused by the bearing 212 are minimized. In other words an interaction between the bearing 212 and the magnet 206 is reduced compared to the setup as discussed in FIG. 12. A thermal coupling between the bearing 212 and the magnet(s) is minimized in the setup of FIG. 12A compared to the setup of FIG. 12. The shaft 101 may have a small shoulder 103 (e.g. 1/10^(th) mm in radial direction) which avoids that the thin walled part of the shaft is being damaged when the bearing 212 is pulled over the shaft 101.

FIG. 12B illustrates a situation after a sleeve 214 a is mounted on to the thin walled end portion of the shaft 101 as illustrated in FIG. 12A. For the sake of brevity like elements are illustrated using like reference numerals. The implementation of FIG. 12B will improve a shielding over the arrangement of FIG. 12A due to an overall increased wall thickness at the end portion of the shaft 101:

Note that a slight eccentricity of the outer sleeve 214 a (e.g. due to mounting tolerances—not shown in FIG. 12B) is most likely not to increase an angle error of the angle sensor, namely the sensing element(s) 104. This is because the inner shield formed by the thinned wall portion of thickness d is dominant. This is to say the inner shield will shield off the magnet from the outer sleeve 214 a so that any interaction between magnet 206 and sleeve 214 a is greatly reduced by the inner shield. It is to be noted however that the outer sleeve 214 a increases shielding efficiency with regard to external magnetic disturbances.

Preferably, it should hold d2>d, i.e. the outer sleeve 214 a should have a greater thickness d2 than the thin walled end portion of the shaft 101. However, even if d2>d does not hold, the outer sleeve 214 a improves shielding, yet with lower efficiency.

Even more preferably, it should hold da2>da, i.e. the outer sleeve 214 a is longer in axial direction than the distance da by which the magnetic field sensing element(s) 104 is inserted into the bore. However, even if this condition is not met, the outer sleeve 214 a improves the shielding, yet with lower efficiency.

The sleeve 214 a is preferably a soft (magnetic) material with large relative permeability μ_(r)>10, preferably μ_(r)>100, even more preferably μ_(r)>1000, and again even more preferably μ_(r)>10000. It is to be noted that the sleeve 214 a can be made of a different material than the shaft 101. For sleeve 214 a and shaft 101 being made of different materials, it is preferred that the sleeve 214 a has larger μ_(r) than the shaft 101 for the following reasons: The (permanent) magnet 206 has a strong magnetization. As the magnet 206 is close to the thin walled shaft end portion of wall thickness d; the magnet 206 will also magnetize the thin walled end portion of the shaft 101. This magnetization of the thin walled shaft end portion will deteriorate shielding capacity thereof: the thin walled shaft end portion will get closer to saturation, thereby reducing its effective permeability for small superimposed external magnetic fields.

In the context of the present disclosure saturation is to be understood as substantially all magnetic moments inside a material being aligned with the (strong) net magnetic field, so that they cannot further respond to additional superimposed small magnetic fields.

As a consequence the thin walled end portion of shaft 101 cannot shield any longer against the superimposed small magnetic fields. The net effect is that those parts of the shaft 101, which are exposed to large magnetic field, are less efficient for shielding—they will act as if the wall of the thin walled end portion became even thinner in a magnetic sense. The larger a relative permeability μ_(r) of a material is the smaller the magnetic fields are to saturate the material.

FIG. 12C illustrates this relationship. B is the flux density in units Tesla [T], H is the magnetic field in units Ampere per meter [A/m] and μ0 is the magnetic permeability of vacuum (=4π*10⁻⁷[T]), and B_(rem) is the remanence of the material which is obtained if all internal moments are aligned along the excitation H-field: the steeper the curve is near the origin H=0 the larger is the relative permeability μ_(r), yet this also means that the material saturates at smaller magnetic fields H₁<H₂ than for a material with smaller slope near the origin H=0, as is indicated by the dashed line in FIG. 12C for comparison.

It is further conceivable that the sleeve 214 a (see FIG. 12B) is the only part which is shielding off magneto-static fields in the setup of FIG. 12B. Such a situation may occur e.g., if the shaft 101 is made of a non-magnetic material like aluminum or brass or carbon fiber, while the sleeve 214 a is made of soft-magnetic material. Under such conditions the sleeve 214 a will shield the magnetic field sensing element(s) 104 from external magnetic disturbance.

The shield 214 a also minimizes unwanted interaction between the bearing 212 and the magnet 206. It will be appreciated that the bearing 212 has movable parts (e.g. the balls) which may be magnetic and may therefore be magnetized due to the magnetic field of the magnet 206. As a consequence the magnetized bearing 202 may generate a poorly defined magnetic field that superimposes on the field of the magnet 206 at the location of the magnetic field sensing element(s) 104 as indicated by a cross x which lies a length da inwards into the bore. The magnetized bearing 202 will therefore give rise to additional errors in the measurement of the rotational position of the shaft 101.

It will be appreciated that magnet 206 of FIG. 12B is of cylindrical shape, while the magnet of FIG. 12A comprised two individual magnets 206. In both cases the bore within the end portion of the shaft is terminated by a stud hole. Without limitation further options are conceivable and not limiting to the present disclosure.

FIG. 12D shows another arrangement similar to that discussed in relation with FIG. 12A and B. For the sake of brevity like entities in FIG. 12D are given like reference numerals as those in FIGS. 12A or 12B. The arrangement of a sensor being inserted into a bore of a thin-walled end portion of a shaft 101 of FIG. 12D notably comprises a sleeve 214 b different from the sleeve 214 a of FIG. 12B. The sleeve of FIG. 12D shows a gap in radial direction of width gr. The gap may conveniently be just filled with air or plastic or other non-magnetic material. The gap gr will help to improve shielding efficiency of the sleeve 214 b . It will be of advantage to adjust a strength of magnet 206 to the width of the radial gap gr such that the magnetic field of the magnet 206 will not overly saturate the sleeve 214 b . Such a setup will further increase the shielding efficiency of the sleeve 214 b.

FIG. 12E illustrates a further variant of a sleeve 214 c. The arrangement of FIG. 12E is similar to that of FIGS. 12D and 12B, and for the sake of brevity like elements are indicated using like reference numerals. While in FIG. 12D the radial gap gr of sleeve 214 b extends over the full length of the sleeve 214 b in axial direction, the radial gap gr of sleeve 214 c of FIG. 12E extends only partially along a length of the thin walled end portion of the shaft 101. Preferably, the gap gr may extend at least over a length of the sensing elements (indicated by an x along the rotational axis, a distance da away from the opening of the bore). This way the sleeve 214 will effectively shield at least the sensing elements from any external magnetic disturbances. As for the sleeve 124 b of FIG. 12D, the a strength of magnet 206 may be adjusted to a width of the radial gap gr in order to not overly saturate the sleeve 214 c.

When designing an arrangement of a sensing element(s) (indicated by x in FIG. 10, 12A, 12B, 12D, and 12E) within a thinned-wall end portion of a shaft 101, respective dimensions of individual elements may be considered in order to optimize overall performance of the arrangement.

In general an inner diameter Di of the bore 101 should be as small as possible, because this will firstly lead to smaller magnets with larger magnetic fields at a position of the magnetic field sensing element(s) for a given magnet mass (or equivalently: ratio of achievable magnetic field over cost of magnet material). Secondly, the smaller the inner bore diameter Di, the more efficiently external magnetic fields are shielded off by the thinned-wall end portion of shaft 101 and/or a sleeve 214 a, 214 b , 214 c.

If a standard SMD sensor package is used for sensing element(s) 106 (best seen in FIG. 12 where the SMD sensor package 104 is oriented perpendicular to the rotation axis) the SMD sensor package has lateral dimensions of roughly 5 mm×6 mm. If the package is soldered to a small printed circuit board (PCB) and both are placed inside the shaft this calls for a minimum inner bore diameter of the magnet 206 of roughly 12 mm. Then the bore diameter Di of the shaft needs to be at least 16 mm and the shaft outer diameter should be at least 18-20 mm.

However, for leaded sensor packages, the situation is somewhat different, as can be taken from FIG. 13: FIG. 13 illustrates a cross-sectional view through shaft 101 within the thin-walled end portion close to a position of the sensing elements 106 inside the bore of the shaft 101.

Throughout the remainder of this disclosure leaded sensor packages shall be understood as a sensor package where at least one semiconductor chip indicated as chip in FIG. 13) is mounted inside the package and covered by some protective cover such as mold compound mc known in the art. For the leaded sensor further at least two sensor leads stick out of the protective cover mc, and the sensor leads are contacted to the chip in order to be able to supply the chip with electric energy and to get an output signal of the chip. It is convenient for the leads to be directed to one side of the package (which is the open end of shaft side—left in FIG. 13).

Note that the leads might enter the protective cover mc at several faces at its perimeter—it is however useful for the leads to bend towards one side, namely the open end of shaft 101. Of course the preferred case is that all leads stick out at one face of the package. It is also not necessary that the chip(s) is/are mounted on a lead frame as illustrated in FIG. 13. The lead frame may comprise a die-paddle to which the chip is glued or mounted and leads. It is to be understood that leads are required in order to energize the sensing elements and to obtain an output of the sensor. Alternatively, simple wires may be used instead of the lead frame. It is rather to be understood that the lead frame is optional for all sensing elements discussed throughout this disclosure.

Moreover, the chip can be contacted in various ways: e.g. by bond wires (bw) as shown in FIG. 13 or by flip chip assembly on a lead frame or other means of contacting known in the art, which are not essential for the present disclosure and shall therefore not be discussed at length.

A lower limit of Di is given by the package for the magnetic field sensing element(s) plus the necessary clearance between this package and the inner bore of the magnet 206. The smallest possible semiconductor chip size in diametrical direction is about 1 mm. This gives a package size of 2.5 mm in diametrical direction. Thus, the minimum bore diameter for the magnet is 3 mm and hence the minimum bore diameter Di of the thin-walled end portion of the shaft is 5 mm. In order to maintain mechanical stability of the shaft a minimum outer diameter of the shaft is 6 mm.

Note that in FIG. 13 the magnetic field sensing elements 106 preferably detect an orientation of the magnetic field vector projected onto a plane that is perpendicular to the z-axis. The chip is typically arranged parallel to the z-axis. Consequently, the projection of the magnetic field vector onto a plane that is perpendicular to the z-axis can be decomposed into an x- and a y-component, whereby the y-component is in plane to the chip and the x-component is perpendicular to the chip.

If one now decides to use a Cartesian coordinate system with (x,y,z)-axes. Consequently, the magnetic field sensing elements 106 must be able to detect the angle between x- and y-components of the magnetic field generated by the magnet 206. This is an out-of-plane angle according to tan(angle)=Bx/By (because x is perpendicular to the chip plane). Common magneto-resistive elements detect only in-plane angles (i.e.

angles between y- and z-components of magnetic fields according to tan(angle)=By/Bz). Out-of-plane angles can be detected by a combination of at least one Hall plate and one vertical Hall effect device.

It is further to be understood that a placement of the sensing elements 106 into the bore should be as symmetrical as possible with regards to the magnet 206. Under the same token it is of interest to place the magnet 206 as symmetrical as possible within the bore.

FIG. 14A illustrates a cross-sectional view of the thin-walled end portion of the shaft 101 with a cylindrical magnet 206. It is to be noted that FIG. 14A like the other drawings referred to herein may not be drawn to scale. A position of the sensing elements 106 is indicated by a cross along the z axis. In fact the position of the sensing element is chosen as origin in the setup of FIG. 14A. The magnet 206 may be placed symmetrical in z direction around the sensor position x. For such a placement the length S1 is identical to S2. If further an opening of the magnet 206 is concentric with z axis, a distance S5 is identical to a distance S6 as indicated in FIG. 14A. Should however the opening of the magnet not be concentric with an outer perimeter of the magnet 206, distance S7 may not be identical to distance S8 of FIG. 14A. It will further be understood that S5 may not be identical to S6, if the inner bore of the magnet 206 and/or a perimeter of the magnet 206 may be elliptical in shape or not circular.

Preferably, as many as possible of the above mentioned equations should substantially hold, namely S1=S2, S3=S4, S5=S6, and S7=S8. Motivation for meeting as many as possible of the above equations is the fact that a highest possible level of field homogeneity of the magnetic field may be achieved. This is a different way of saying that a maximum number of spatial derivatives of the magnetic field will vanish at the sensor position x, if the above equations are met. As a consequence of vanishing magnetic field derivatives, (assembly) tolerances in direction of the vanishing magnetic field derivative will not have an impact on an angle measurement of the sensing element 106. A person of ordinary skill will appreciate that the above symmetry considerations are made under the assumption of a substantially homogeneous magnetization of the magnet 206.

FIG. 14B-14D illustrate variants of the thin-walled end portion of the shaft 101 with magnet 206 and a length of the bore S3+S4 centered around the sensor position x. For the sake of brevity like elements are referred to using like reference numerals.

In FIG. 14B the bore terminates in a cone shaped tip, while the bore of FIG. 14C tapers from the inner diameter Di to a minimal diameter Dm, while instead the bore of FIG. 14D changes from the inner diameter Di yielding a shoulder to the minimal diameter Dm. A person of ordinary skill will appreciate ways of achieving the different forms of terminating the bore at an end facing away from the opening (in the figures depicted to the right).

It will be noted, that so far the thin-walled bore of shaft 101, the magnet 206, as well as the bore of the magnet have been considered circular when viewed along the z axis. A very large number of shapes are possible for these elements, and only a selection thereof will be discussed in the following in conjunction with FIGS. 15A-15I. These figures illustrate a cross-sectional views into the bore at the thin-walled end portion of a shaft in a plane perpendicular to the rotational z axis, respectively.

FIG. 15A shows a cross section of a shaft 101 with circular outer perimeter, a circular bore and a magnet 206 with both circular outer perimeter and bore, wherein all circular bores and/or perimeters are being concentric to the rotational axis z.

In FIG. 15B an outer perimeter of the shaft 101 is cylindrical, while a bore of the shaft 101 is elliptical, the outer perimeter of the magnet fits into the elliptical bore. Further a bore of the magnet is also elliptical, yet long and short axis of the shaft bore may not coincide with long and short axis of the elliptical bore of magnet 206. In the setup of FIG. 15B the long axis of the magnet's outer perimeter is along x-direction whereas the long axis of the magnet bore in along y-direction. Alternatively, both long axes may also be parallel or at any other angle between them.

FIG. 15C shows a cylindrical shaft 101, while a bore in the thin-walled end portion of the shaft is of a square or rectangular shape. The outer perimeter of the magnet 206 is in fact matching the shape of the bore of the shaft 101. The bore of magnet 206 is of circular shape. Again all shapes are centered on the axis of rotation z, which is however not limiting the present disclosure.

FIG. 15D is similar to FIG. 15C, yet the bore of the magnet 206 is rectangular or square shaped, instead of circular. The outer perimeter of the magnet 206 matches the rectangular shape of the bore of the shaft 101.

FIG. 15E is similar to FIG. 15C or 15D. However, in FIG. 15E the bore of the magnet 206 is of hexagonal shape. Again, the outer perimeter of the magnet 206 matches the rectangular shape of the bore of the shaft 101.

In FIG. 15F a bore of the shaft 101 is of pentagonal perimeter, while a bore of the magnet 206 is of hexagonal shape. As before an inner perimeter of the bore within shaft 101 matches an outer perimeter of the magnet 206.

In FIGS. 15G-15H a bore of the shaft 101 has a different geometry than an outer perimeter of magnet 206. In FIG. 15G an inner perimeter of the thin-walled end portion of shaft 101 is circular, while an outer perimeter of the magnet 206 is of pentagonal shape. Such a setup leaves some clearance between the inner perimeter of the shaft's bore and the outer perimeter of the magnet 206. The magnet 206 of FIG. 15G comprises a hexagonal bore.

In FIG. 15H an outer perimeter of the shaft 101 is not circular, but hexagonal, while a perimeter of the bore of the thin-walled end portion of the shaft 101 is of circular shape. An outer perimeter of the magnet is of pentagonal shape. As for FIG. 15H a bore of the magnet is of hexagonal shape.

In both cases of FIG. 15G and 15H, we have a gap between the respective magnet 206 and the bore of the shaft, yet this gap has a varying width. It will be appreciated that the magnet 206 may be glued into the bore of the shaft 101 or mechanically fixed inside the bore by any suitable means.

In FIG. 15I there is a gap of constant width between the magnet 206 and the bore of the shaft 101. The gap may be filled with air or with plastic or some other material that is basically nonmagnetic, or some glue in order to fixate respective magnet 206 within the bore of shaft 101.

Without limitation a magnet 206, as discussed herein, may be decomposed into 2, 3, 4, . . . N segments, which are arranged in a pattern that has a symmetry such that when rotated around the rotation axis z by an angle 360°/N it is identical to the original shape, which may also be referred to as N-fold symmetry. A magnet 206 of N-fold symmetry is shown in cross section in FIG. 16 for the case N=4 comprising magnet segments 206 a, 206 b, 206 c, 206 d. Such a segmented magnet 206 may be for example produced by an injection molding process as is known in the art.

A person of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that in order to determine a rotational position of the shaft 101 based on (rotating) magnetic fields at the sensor position, it is of interest to assure a well-defined position of the magnet 206 within the bore of the shaft 101, in particular with regards to an azimuthal direction, which is the direction of rotation of the shaft 101. To this end it is convenient to provide one or more groves 205 a, 205 b, and 205 c on the outer perimeter of the magnet 206. The grooves can be filled with glue that is used to glue the magnet into the bore of the shaft. The grooves 205 a, 205 b, 205 c may also have the purpose to take up thermo-mechanical strain of the magnet 206 inside the bore of the shaft 101 in order to reduce mechanical stress on the magnet 206. This will help to avoid breaking of the magnet 206. While the grooves 205 a, 205 b, 205 c are illustrated in FIG. 17 as grooves of the magnet 206, the groves may alternatively or additionally be provided on the inner perimeter of the bore (not shown in FIG. 17).

FIG. 18 illustrates a further option of assuring a defined azimuthal position of the magnet 206 within the shaft 101. As a further option it is also possible to introduce certain unique asymmetries into the magnet and the shaft, which serve as keys 207 to define an azimuthal position of the magnet 206 relative to the shaft 101. Again FIG. 18 gives a non-limiting example of such deliberate asymmetries. Likewise the magnet could be of frustum shape in combination with a mating shape of the bore within the shaft 101.

FIG. 19A illustrates a further embodiment of a magnet 206 within the shaft 101 having an outer diameter D. While a bore in axial direction of the shaft 101 has a constant inner diameter 2*S4 and the magnet 206 has a corresponding outer diameter, the inner diameter of the magnet 206 varies along the axial direction z from 2*S5 to 2*S3 with S3<S5 or S3>S5 (not shown).

FIG. 19B illustrates a further variant of a magnet 206 within the shaft 101 of outer diameter D. For the exemplary embodiment of FIG. 19B, the inner diameter of the bore tapers from 2*S4 to 2*S6. Correspondingly, an outer diameter of the magnet 206 within the bore corresponds to the inner diameter of the bore along the axial extension of the magnet 206. It will be noted that the tapered shape of outer diameter of the magnet 206 and the inner diameter of the bore can be chosen to arrange the magnet 206 within the bore in an intended axial position, say centered around the sensitive spot of a sensor arrangement indicated by the cross in FIG. 19B. Different to the embodiment illustrated within FIG. 19A, for the embodiment of FIG. 19B no further measures may be required to arrange the magnet within the bore in an intended position along the axial direction z. Different to the embodiment of FIG. 19A, it may be sufficient to slide the magnet 206 into the bore until the magnet stops its travel along the axial direction z when reaching the intended axial position in which an outer face of the magnet 206 mates with an inner face of the bore, as indicated in FIG. 19B.

FIG. 20 illustrates a further implementation of a magnet 206 within a bore of a shaft 101. However, the inner diameter of the bore comprises a step or shoulder changing the inner diameter of the bore from 2*S4 to 2*S6 with S6<S4. Obviously, the shoulder provides an abutment for limiting an axial movability of the magnet 206 in z direction.

It will be appreciated that any sensor and/or magnet arrangements within a bore of a shaft, as discussed herein, are of particular interest with regards to measuring an angular position of a rotatable shaft or a driving shaft of an engine. Examples that spring to mind are a driving shaft of a combustion engine, a transmission shaft of any power train/ driving train system, or a driving shaft of an electrical motor as used in an electrical vehicle as non-limiting examples. It is to be understood that the rotatable shaft 101 as considered in this disclosure, is configured to transmit a torque of up to several hundreds or even thousand Newton meters Nm. Therefore the shaft 101 as contemplated within this disclosure needs to be of sufficient torsional stiffness to reliably deliver such high torques.

A person of ordinary skill will further appreciate that there may be substantial spatial limitations within an engine compartment of say an electrical vehicle. For control of the electrical motor of such vehicle an angular position of the driving shaft needs to be known with high accuracy. According to the prior art, this task was solved using a resolver, i.e. a mechanical extension of the driving shaft that would indicate the angular position of the shaft. Obviously such a resolver requires extra space within the engine compartment as a trade-off.

Further, accuracy of an angular position as indicated by the resolver, hinges on a precise mounting of the resolver extending the driving shaft 101. Any deviation or tolerance in the position of the resolver relative to the driving shaft will deteriorate a precision of the driving shaft's angular position as indicated by the resolver element. Advantages of an end portion of the shaft comprising a bore in axial direction of the driving shaft, and the bore containing the angular sensing element over a resolver solution known in the art also prevail for combustion engines, say for example in a car powered by such combustion engine.

A person of ordinary skill will readily appreciate that for driving shafts 101 delivering high torque movement, there typically are notable assembly tolerances for a resolver. These tolerances may be caused by static or dynamic deformation of the shaft, positioning tolerances of involved mechanical parts, or the resolver element alike.

Static deformation of the driving shaft 101 may be due to any deterioration of the shaft or objects hitting the driving shaft itself.

Dynamic deformation of the driving shaft may be caused by an unbalance of the driving shaft, say due to deformation causing an additional moment of inertia due to such deformation. Obviously, such static and/or dynamic deformation will project onto the resolver element and deteriorate achievable precision of angular position indicated by the resolver element.

Static deformation of a resolver element may likewise be caused by an object hitting the resolver and deforming it. Such deformation may potentially cause the resolver being offset relative to the axis of the driving shaft to give just an example. Such deformation may further cause an unbalance of the resolver giving rise to an additional moment of inertia during rotation of the resolver with the driving shaft 101, which may actually support further deterioration of the resolver and/or the driving shaft 101.

A person of ordinary skill will appreciate that heavy-duty roller bearings may be of interest in combination with a driving shaft transmitting high-torque movement. Such roller bearings will require substantial bearing backlash than typically would be the case for precision bearings as used for transmission of low-torque movement in the range of a few Newton meters or even below one Newton meter. The bearing backlash in heavy-duty bearings will typically increase backlash in radial and axial direction in comparison to precision bearings as used for transmission of low-torque movement.

It will therefore become apparent to a person skilled in the art, why it is of interest to provide a bearing 202, 212 for the driving shaft 101 when using the angle sensing solution for a driving shaft delivering high torque rotation as disclosed herein, and already described with regards to FIGS. 2-5,12-12B, 12D, and 12E.

A person of ordinary skill will further appreciate that it is a convenient to use a solid or massive shaft for high-torque movement being delivered by the driving shaft 101 according to the present disclosure. With a hollow shaft it may prove difficult to deliver the high-torque movement reliably as a hollow shaft may not provide the torsional stiffness required for such delivery. The present disclosure achieves higher accuracy angle measurement by placing the angular sensing element into an axial bore within an end portion of the driving shaft 101. As a trade-off mechanical stability, in particular torsional stiffness of this hollowed end portion may be reduced. It may therefore be of interest to provide a portion of the driving shaft that is massive and supported by a bearing as can be seen in embodiments as discussed in FIGS. 12A, B, D and 12E. For such an arrangement the bearing does not engage with the driving shaft in a portion of reduced torsional stiffness due to the axial bore within the end portion of the shaft 101.

It is a benefit of an “in shaft” placement of the (angular) sensing element 106 as disclosed herein to reduce additional mechanical tolerances caused by static or dynamic deformations, as discussed above with regards to the use of the resolver.

It may be of interest to seal the sensing element 106 from harsh environments within the engine compartment of vehicles. Such harsh environments may be for example caused due to aggressive liquids that would potentially harm the sensing element 106, such as for example transmission lubricant, as present in gear boxes commonly known in cars run by a combustion engine to give a non-limiting example. Automatic gear boxes typically comprise one or more driving shafts 101 for which an angular position and/or an angular velocity is of interest in order to provide smooth gear-shifting experience.

It is to be understood that any disclosure in the following pertaining to the sensing element 106 may also apply without limitation to the sensing elements 104 as discussed in conjunction with FIGS. 1-6, and 12 above. Further it may be of interest to seal the (angular) sensing element 106 from magnetic pollution as it may affect the sensing element 106 based on a magnetic sensing principle. Magnetic pollution is known in the form of iron filings omnipresent in many types of machinery. Should such magnetic pollution reach the bore within the driving shaft 101, the (angular) sensing will deteriorate considerably. Therefore sealing of the bore may be of interest for in shaft (angular) sensing as disclosed herein. FIGS. 21A and 21B illustrate examples of a possible sealing of sensing elements 106. The arrangements shown in FIGS. 21A and 21B are somewhat similar to the arrangement discussed in connection with FIG. 13. A cover 212 is used to close the axial bore within the end portion of the driving shaft 101. The cover may be made from printed circuit board (PCB) material but is not limited thereto. Like elements in FIGS. 21A and 21B are given identical reference numerals and shall therefore not be discussed in detail again to avoid an overly amount of repetition. In the embodiment of FIG. 21A it is proposed to use a ring 208 mounted to a surface of the cover 212. It may be of interest to have the ring 208 mate with a sealing member 210. A grove in azimuthal direction may accommodate the sealing member 210. The sealing member 210 may be implemented as a simple O-ring or a sealed bearing as known in the art, for example implemented as a bearing comprising an inner sealing lip (not shown) to seal the inside of the bore from an outside. Without limitation the sealed bearing may further comprise an outer sealing lip. It is to be noted that irrespective of a torque the driving shaft 101 delivers, the sealing member 210 may be in contact with a substantial portion of the delivered torque within azimuthal direction. Suitable materials and dimensions for the sealing member in order to withstand the substantial portion of the delivered torque in azimuthal direction are known in the art. A non-limiting example for the sealing member is a pressed O-ring of suitable dimensions sealing the inside of the bore from an outside. It is further of interest to mount the cover 212 such that it does not follow the rotational movement of the driving shaft 101 but takes a static position with regards to the azimuthal direction while sealing the inside of the bore from the outside. The static or stator position of the cover 212 and hence the (angular) sensing element 216 relative to the driving shaft 101 may be achieved using a holder structure (not shown). FIG. 21B discloses a further embodiment of a possible sealing of sensing element 106 from an outside of the driving shaft 101. A gasket 214 connecting to the cover 212 is employed to embrace a circumference of a hollow end portion of the shaft i.e. driving shaft 101. It may be convenient to implement a sealing element bridging the gasket 214 and the driving shaft 101 in radial direction (indicated as vertical direction x in FIG. 21B). As for the sealing member of FIG. 21A, the sealing member 208 may be implemented as an O-ring or a bearing comprising at least one sealing lip as is known in the art. According to a variant of the sealing member 208 as discussed with regards to FIGS. 21A and 21B, one may implement the cover 208 following the rotational movement of the driving shaft 101. Such design for sealing the sensing elements 106 would relax requirements on sealing member 208, as those elements would be no longer exposed to the torque delivered but moving concomitantly with the driving shaft 101. It is however to be noted that for such a setup a further sealing element 210 would be required embracing a portion of the PCB traversing the cover 212. This is of interest in order to make sure that the (angular) sensing element 106 stays in a substantially fixed angular position relative to the rotatable driving shaft 101. While a shaft-integrated or “in-shaft” arrangement of the (angular) sensing elements 106 within the end portion of the driving shaft 101 helps to reduce radial and/or axial assembly tolerances compared to a setup employing a resolver, these assembly tolerances are still present with the in-shaft arrangement, yet at a reduced level. This is to say for a resolver having an eccentricity of say 0.5 mm with regards to the rotation axis of the driving shaft, an angle error achieved with the resolver will be larger than an angular error achieved with the in-shaft arrangement for a setup with an eccentricity of the magnet of 0.5 mm relative to the rotational axis. It is an option to employ magnet arrangements 206 with magnetic fields of high homogeneity in order to reduce a deteriorating effect of radial and/or axial assembly tolerances for the in-shaft arrangement of angular sensing elements 106 within the shaft 101 further. It is to be understood that high homogeneity magnets may be used with any of the in-shaft magnet arrangements 206 as disclosed herein. FIG. 22A illustrates a first example of such high homogeneity magnet arrangements 206. In FIG. 22A a cross-sectional view of a magnet arrangement is shown. A cross in FIG. 22A indicates a position to correspond to a position of the rotational axis of the driving shaft once the magnet is arranged within the bore of the driving shaft (not shown). The magnet arrangement of FIG. 22A comprises eight magnetic members arranged to form a magnet ring of octagonal shape as a non-limiting example. For each of the magnetic members a direction of magnetization 206-1 to 206-4 is indicated. For such an arrangement of magnetic members a substantially uniform overall magnetic field 207 will form inside the magnet ring, while outside the ring shaped magnet arrangement 206 very little or virtually even no magnetic field may be present. Such magnet arrangements are known as Halbach magnets in the art. It may be convenient to glue the individual magnet elements 206 together prior or after each segment has been magnetized. Any other way of arranging the magnetic elements 206 may be employed instead, provided the arranging will substantially not hamper homogeneity of the magnetic field within the ring structure. A person familiar with magnet arrangements 206 of the Halbach-type will appreciate that an extension of the Halbach magnet arrangement 206 in axial direction is preferably larger than an inner diameter of the Halbach-type magnet in the radial direction, even more preferably larger than an outer diameter of the Halbach-type magnet in the radial direction. Such dimensions typically help to improve magnetic field homogeneity in radial direction and in axial direction alike. FIG. 22B illustrates a further exemplary embodiment of a Halbach-type magnet 206 in a cross-sectional view. It will be noted that the magnet 206 of FIG. 22B comprises a unitary member having an inhomogeneous magnetization which is somewhat balanced within the cross-section shown, so that most of magnetic fields lines are concentrated at the center of the magnet 206 while the outside of the ring-shaped magnet is virtually free from magnetic fields. The advantage of such a Halbach-type arrangement for the magnet 206 as discussed with regards to FIGS. 22A, 22B is two-fold: Firstly, the sensing element 106 will be less sensitive to assembly tolerances in radial and/or axial direction, as for such a displacement, the sensor will virtually see no or very little change in magnetic field (direction) in the presence of such assembly tolerances. Therefore it becomes easier to place more than one (angular) sensing element 106 within the region of substantially homogeneous magnetic field 207 (as indicated in FIGS. 22A-C). The more than one sensing element will then see the identical magnetic field 207, which may be of interest when building a redundant and/or diverse magnetic (angle) sensing system. A diverse magnetic (angle) sensing system measures the magnetic field 207 with the more than one sensing element, each of which employing a different, i.e. diverse sensing principle, say the first using a GMR sensor, the second using a Hall sensor as non-limiting example. In case of a (transient) disturbance the more than one diverse sensing element would respond differently to the (transient) disturbance due to their diverse sensing principle. A person of ordinary skill will therefore appreciate that the (transient) disturbance will become apparent when employing the more than one diverse sensing element. Instead, any sensed data due to the (transient) disturbance would not become apparent when using merely redundant more than one sensing elements, all of which employing an identical, i.e. non-diverse sensing principle. For the merely redundant more than one sensing element, all of the sensing elements would show a substantially identical sensed value as caused by the same (transient) disturbance—also referred to as common cause fault due to the (transient) disturbance. As a second advantage of Halbach-type magnet 206, the room outside the magnet 206 will be substantially free from any magnetic field, which will reduce any magnetic disturbances projecting from the magnet 206 to any magnetically susceptible structures surrounding the magnet 206 and hence the driving shaft 101. Moreover, eccentric mounting of the magnet inside the bore of a ferrous shaft does not deteriorate the homogeneity of the magnetic field on the sensing elements in the center of the Halbach-type ring magnet, because the magnet does not apply magnetic field to the shaft encircling it. The Halbach-type magnet 206 of FIG. 22B may be formed as a unitary member employing some molding techniques or magnetization techniques achieving a non-homogeneous magnet, as was explained in detail within an earlier Patent application of the applicant filed on 29 Jul. 2015 by the applicant as U.S. Ser. No. 14/812,907 which is incorporated herein in its entirety. FIG. 22C illustrates a cross-section of another Halbach-type magnet 206, wherein a magnetization within the ring-shaped magnet changes almost continuously, while the magnetic field inside the ring shows a very high degree of homogeneity.

While the method and variations thereof are illustrated and described below as a series of acts or events, it will be appreciated that the illustrated ordering of such acts or events are not to be interpreted in a limiting sense. For example, some acts may occur in different orders and/or concurrently with other acts or events apart from those illustrated and/or described herein. In addition, not all illustrated acts may be required to implement one or more aspects or embodiments of the disclosure herein. Also, one or more of the acts depicted herein may be carried out in one or more separate acts and/or phases.

It is appreciated that the claimed subject matter may be implemented as a method, apparatus, or article of manufacture using standard programming and/or engineering techniques to produce software, firmware, hardware, or any combination thereof to control a computer to implement the disclosed subject matter (e.g., the systems/devices shown in FIGS. 1, 2, etc., are non-limiting examples of system that may be used to implement the above methods). The term “article of manufacture” as used herein is intended to encompass a computer program accessible from any computer-readable device, carrier, or media. Of course, those skilled in the art will recognize many modifications may be made to this configuration without departing from the scope or spirit of the claimed subject matter.

A sensor arrangement includes a sensor element and a magnet module. The sensor element is configured to measure a magnetic field and is positioned within a shaft. The shaft is configured to shield the magnet module and the sensor element. The magnet module is configured to generate the magnetic field. The sensor element is at least partially positioned within the shaft.

Another sensor arrangement includes a sensor module, a case and a shaft. The sensor module is configured to measure a magnetic field. The case has a module opening and a case recess. The sensor module is positioned within the module opening. The shaft is coupled to the shaft recess and has a magnet module configured to generate the magnetic field. The shaft is configured to shield the magnet module and the sensor module.

An integrated sensor device includes a sensor module, a case and a magnet module. The sensor module is configured to measure a magnetic field. The case has a module opening and a shaft recess and is configured to shield the sensor module. The sensor module is positioned within the module opening. The magnet module is positioned within a shaft. The shaft is coupled to the shaft recess. The magnet module is configured to generate the magnetic field. The shaft is configured to shield the magnet module.

A sensor system having a sensor module, an interface, and a control unit is disclosed. The sensor module is located within a case and has a sensor element configured to provide measurements of a magnetic field. The case shields the sensor module from one or more disturbances. The interface is coupled to the shielded sensor module and configured to transfer magnetic field measurements from the shielded sensor module. The control unit is configured to determine angular information based on the magnetic field measurements.

A method of operating a sensor device is disclosed. A sensor module is configured or positioned into a case. The sensor module is shielded from one or more disturbances by the case. A shaft is configured to have a shaft recess. A magnet module is positioned within the shaft recess. The magnet module is shielded from the one or more disturbances by the shaft. A magnetic field is generated by the magnet module. The magnetic field is measured by the sensor module.

In particular regard to the various functions performed by the above described components or structures (assemblies, devices, circuits, systems, etc.), the terms (including a reference to a “means”) used to describe such components are intended to correspond, unless otherwise indicated, to any component or structure which performs the specified function of the described component (e.g., that is functionally equivalent), even though not structurally equivalent to the disclosed structure which performs the function in the herein illustrated exemplary implementations of the invention. In addition, while a particular feature of the invention may have been disclosed with respect to only one of several implementations, such feature may be combined with one or more other features of the other implementations as may be desired and advantageous for any given or particular application. Furthermore, to the extent that the terms “including”, “includes”, “having”, “has”, “with”, or variants thereof are used in either the detailed description and the claims, such terms are intended to be inclusive in a manner similar to the term “comprising”. 

What is claimed is:
 1. A sensor arrangement comprising: a rotatable driving shaft extending along a rotation axis and comprising a bore extending from a first end face of the shaft along the rotation axis; a magnet module arranged within the bore and coupled to the driving shaft, the magnet module configured to generate a magnetic field within the bore; and a sensing element configured to sense a rotation of the magnetic field in response to rotation of the driving shaft.
 2. The arrangement of claim 1, wherein the sensing element has a sensitive spot, the sensitive spot being arranged within the bore and exposed to the rotating magnetic field.
 3. The arrangement of claim 1, further comprising a sealing member couplable to the driving shaft to cover the bore, the sealing member separating the sensing element arranged inside the bore from an outside of the bore.
 4. The arrangement of claim 3, wherein the sealing member is coupled to a circumferential face of the end portion of the driving shaft.
 5. The arrangement of claim 3, wherein the sealing member is coupled to the first end face of the driving shaft.
 6. The arrangement of claim 1, wherein the driving shaft is configured to transmit a high torque of at least tens of Newton meters, preferably several hundreds of Newton meters.
 7. The arrangement of claim 1, wherein the driving shaft is configured to transmit rotational movement for propulsion of a vehicle.
 8. The arrangement of claim 1, wherein the sensing element is implemented as a semiconductor device comprising at least one die.
 9. The arrangement of claim 1, wherein the magnet arrangement provides a magnetic field being mainly contained within an outer circumference of the magnet arrangement.
 10. The arrangement of claim 1, wherein the driving shaft comprises a soft-magnetic or ferrous material shielding magnetic disturbances from the sensing element.
 11. The arrangement of claim 9, wherein a dimension of the magnet arrangement in axial direction is larger than an inner diameter of the magnet arrangement, preferably larger than an outer diameter of the magnet arrangement.
 12. The arrangement of claim 9, wherein the magnet arrangement is implemented as a unitary member.
 13. The arrangement of claim 9, wherein the magnet arrangement is of substantially annular shape comprising a homogeneous distribution of magnetic flux within a center region of the magnet arrangement.
 14. The arrangement of claim 1, further comprising a locking mechanism configured to lock the magnet arrangement inside the bore at a defined position along the axial direction.
 15. The arrangement of claim 1, further comprising a locking mechanism configured to lock the magnet arrangement inside the bore at a defined azimuthal position relative to the axial direction.
 16. The arrangement of claim 1, wherein an inner diameter of the bore tapers from a first diameter at the first end face of the driving shaft to a second diameter smaller than the first diameter.
 17. The arrangement of claim 3, wherein the sealing member comprises a sealed bearing, the sealed bearing.
 18. The arrangement of claim 3, wherein the sealing member is fixedly arranged relative to the driving shaft.
 19. The arrangement of claim 1, wherein the magnet is a magnetic pill. 